Case 2 Permeability = 1E-19m2

 

Overview

The objective is to re-perform the simulation using the permeability (k) = 1.0E-19m2.  This is achieved by defining a new material in the hm_002_elastic.mat file called hm_002_elastic_1E19 and then changing the data file to read this data.  The example data is provided in HM_003\Exercises\Case 2\Data. The case with the linear sedimentation time curve is hm_003_Case2.dat and hm_003_Case2a.dat is the S-Curve sedimentation time curve case.

 

Results

The result files for the project are in directory: HM_002\Exercises\Case 2\results and the high definition history files can be displayed in excel file hm_003_Case3.xlsx.   The evolution of pore pressure and effective stress are shown below.   The predicted maximum overpressure at the base of the column is ca. 5.3 MPa for hm_003_Case3 and ca. 5,4 Ma for hm_003_Case3.  These values are very close to the analytical solution.

hm_003_Case2_01

HM_002_Case2_01

hm_003_Case2A

hm_003_Case2A

Effective Vertical/Horizontal Stress and Pore Pressure as a Function of Time

Comparison of the pore pressure vs. time curves for the two cases show that they are almost identical in the post-sedimentation phase between t = 1.1 and t = 2.0s.

hm_003_Case2a_03

Comparison of the Predicted Pore Pressure Evolution for Case 2 and Case 2A

The graphs of pore pressure, vertical effective stress and horizontal effective stress as a function of depth are created by exporting data for "graph on a line" from ParaView at time t = 1.0 Ma and t = 2.0 Ma.   Due to the large overpressure the effective stresses at time t=1,0 Ma are very low but increase significantly by time t = 2.0 Ma.

hm_003_Case2a_01

hm_003_Case2a_02

t = 1.0Ma

t = 2.0 Ma

Effective Vertical/Horizontal Stress and Pore Pressure as a Function of Depth

 

The predicted overpressure profile as a function of depth at t = 1.0Ma is very close to the analytical solution.  An exact match is not expected due to the slightly different loading regimes in the analytical model and the simulation.

 

hm_003_Case2a_04

Comparison of the Predicted Pore Pressure and the Analytical Solution at time t = 1.0 Ma