Ex_008 Well Element

 

The examples here demonstrate the usage of well elements for different field applications and modelling scenarios.

 

Tutorial Examples

 

 

Case01 and Case02 examples demonstrate the usage of well elements in an illustrative THM injection and production models akin to the MEM example MEM_001 Case04 HM Coupled Producer and Injector Wells. It is assumed that the user is familiar with the MEM workflow and data structures demonstrated in MEM_001_Case04. Hence, only the data associated with usage of well elements and thermal data will be described.

 

Ex_008_Case01_01

 

Ex_008_Case02_01

Case 01 Injection and production THM model

Case 02 Injection and production THM model with contact advection along fault

 

 

Injection and depletion of a reservoir layer via well elements will be simulated.  The reservoir is underlain and overlain by shale lithologies.  The 250m thick reservoir is at a depth of 1500m below the surface. The model is initialized following a sequence of stages:

Stage 1: Elastic gravity initialization.

Stage 2: Contact release (Initialization).

Stage 3: Constitutive release (Initialization).

Stage 4: Start of well injection ramped up to rate of 5000 m3/day over 10 days.

Stage 5: Start of well production ramped up to rate of 5000 m3/day over 10 days.

Stage 6: Injection and production flow at constant rate of 5000 m3/day simulated over 14 years (5110 days) for Case01 and 84 years (30660 days) for Case02.

 

Features of the 3D model comprise:

1.THM coupled simulation.

2.Deactivated porous flow in shale layers.

3.Seven material layers with two reservoir layers.

4.Two wells - one injector well and one producer well.

5.Incline fault separating the two wells.

6.Initial hydrostatic pore pressure.

7.Initial depth-dependent spatial temperature gradient.

8.Well injection and production rate of 5000m3/day.  Well injection fluid temperature is defined as 30°C.

9.Contact advection along fault (Case02 only).

10.Well definition history (Case02 only).

11.Usage of transient time growth increment in solution control for simulation duration over 14/84 years.

 

 

The tables below show the thermal material input data for the shale and reservoir layers and pore/well fluid.

 

Material Properties

The principal thermal parameters for the shale material layers are:

 

Material Properties

Standard Units

Input Data in "days" time units

Grain thermal conductivity

2.63 W/m/K

2.27E+05 (N.m/day)/m/K

Grain specific heat capacity

860 J/kg/K

860 J/kg/K

 

The principal thermal parameters for the reservoir material layers are:

 

Material Properties

Standard Units

Input Data in "days" time units

Grain thermal conductivity

4.53 W/m/K

3.91E+05 (N.m/day)/m/K

Grain specific heat capacity

855 J/kg/K

855 J/kg/K

 

Fluid Properties

The principal parameters for the pore and well fluid "water" are:

 

Fluid Properties

Standard Units

Input Data in "days" time units

Viscosity (μf)

1.0 cP

1.157E-08 Pa.day

Fluid thermal conductivity

0.60 W/m/K

5.18E+04 (N.m/day)/m/K

Fluid specific heat capacity

4000 J/kg/K

4000 J/kg/K

 

 

 

Wellbore heat transmission in U-shaped geothermal wells with multiple well completions in a multi-layered rock model.

 

Ex_008_Case03_01

 

Case03: Schematic of U-shaped Well Geothermal Production System (adapted from Ref.1)

 

 

 

Application of the Peaceman model on well elements with emphasis on the influence of skin factor.

 

Ex_008_Case04_01

 

Case04: Example Model Geometry (overlaid with Mesh Definition)

References

 

[1] Yuanyuan Ma, Shibin Li, Ligang Zhang, Songze Liu, Ming Wang, Heat extraction performance evaluation of U-shaped well geothermal production system under different well-layout parameters and engineering schemes, Elsevier Renewable Energy 203 (2023) 473 - 484.