ParaGeo Validation Examples

 

In this section several validation cases are presented. Those comprise typical problems which are validated against an analytical or reference solutions.

 

 

INDEX

 

 

Title

Analysis Type - Features List / Utility

Model

ParaGeo vs Analytical/Reference Solutions

Val_001 Terzaghi Consolidation Problem

Coupled HM (2D)

 

•Val_001a Explicit Geomechanical Solver

•Val_001b Implicit Geomechanical Solver

•Terzaghi uniaxial consolidation problem

Val_01_02       Val_01_05  

Schematic of model (left), ParaGeo results - dots vs analytical - line (right)

Val_002 Mandel's Problem

Coupled HM (2D)

 

•Val_002a Cylindrical Soil Sample

 

•Mandel's problem

 

Val_02_01     Val_02_02     Val_02_03

Schematic of model (left/middle), ParaGeo results vs analytical (right)

•Val_002b Spherical Soil Sample

•Mandel-Cryer effect

Val_02b_01     Val_02b_03     Val_02b_04

Schematic of model (left), Model mesh (middle), ParaGeo results vs analytical (right)

Val_003 Plane Strain Wellbore Problem

Coupled HM (3D)

 

•Val_003a Permeability of 1⋅10-18 m2

•Val_003b Permeability of 1⋅10-15 m2

•Plane Strain in poroelastic medium (Detournay and Cheng 1988)

Val_003_01     Val_003_02

Schematic of model

Val_003_03

ParaGeo results (dots) vs analytical solution (solid lines)

Val_004 Use of Different Element Formulations

Mechanical (2D and 3D)

 

•Val_004a Internally Pressurized Cylinder

o2D Explicit - QPM4, TPM3, TPM3V,TPM6

o2D Implicit - QPM4, QPM4M, QPM8, QPM8M, TPM3, TPM3M, TPM6, TPM6M

o3D Explicit - HEX8, TET4, TET4V

o3D Implicit - HEX8 (Bbar), HEX8M, HEX20, HEX20M, TET4, TET4M, TET10, TET10M

•Usage of different element types for implicit and explicit analyses

•2D and 3D cases

•Usage of higher order elements

•Usage of elements with mixed formulation

Val_004_05     Val_004_01

•Val_004b Strip Footing Collapse

o2D Explicit - QPM4, TPM6

o2D Implicit - QPM4, QPM4M, QPM8, QPM8M, TPM3M, TPM6, TPM6M

o3D Explicit - HEX8

o3D Implicit - HEX8M, HEX20M, TET4M, TET10, TET10M

Val_004b_01     Val_004_02

•Val_004c Cook's Membrane

o2D Implicit - QPM4, QPM4M, QPM8, QPM8M, TPM3M, TPM6, TPM6M

o3D Implicit - HEX8 (Bbar), HEX8M, HEX20, HEX20M, TET4M, TET10, TET10M

Val_004_001

•Val_004d Billet Upsetting

oCase01 von Mises

▪3D Explicit - HEX8

▪3D Implicit - HEX8 (Bbar), HEX8M, HEX20M, TET4M, TET10, TET10M

 

oCase02 Herschel-Bulkley

▪3D Explicit - HEX8

▪3D Implicit - HEX8 (Bbar), HEX8M

Val_004d_01     Val_004_04

Val_005 Hydrocarbon Maturation Examples

Thermal (2D) / Coupled THM (3D)

 

•Val_005a Kerogen to Oil and Gas Generation (Thermal)

•Val_005b Oil to Gas Cracking (Thermal)

•Val_005c Oil and Gas Expulsion (Coupled THM)

•Val_005d Kerogen Thickness (Coupled THM)

•Petroleum generation, cracking and expulsion for the 5 pre-defined kerogen types (organofacies A, B, C, D/E and F)compared against results by Pepper and Corvi (1995a, 1995b) and Pepper and Dodd (1995)

Val_005_002b         Val_005_001

Model definition (left), Scheme of hydrocarbon and kerogen kinetics (right)

Val_006 Well Geothermal - U-Shaped Closed-Loop Well System

Thermal (3D)

 

•Val_006a Radiant heat Ramey model 1

•Val_006b Radiant heat Hasan model 2

•U-shaped closed-loop well

•Geothermal

•Benchmarked against Stanford calculator based on Ramey equation

Val_006_002    

Schematic of model